HI Bob. I believe Florida's solar adoption will continue proceeding far more smoothly than California's basically for one reason: Regulators and state government are letting the private sector do the work and make the decisions. That's enabled NextEra Energy, for example, to deploy solar with storage in far more orderly and cost effective way than has taken place in California. And it's why Florida customer rates are a fraction of those in California. Bottom line: How you do deployment matters.
More solar means more power when the sun shines. That's just as true in Florida as it is in California, yet the article is silent on how that is being handled in Florida. What other solution can there be but storage? Why aren't the same build out problems for storage in California being also faced by Florida?
HI Bob. I believe Florida's solar adoption will continue proceeding far more smoothly than California's basically for one reason: Regulators and state government are letting the private sector do the work and make the decisions. That's enabled NextEra Energy, for example, to deploy solar with storage in far more orderly and cost effective way than has taken place in California. And it's why Florida customer rates are a fraction of those in California. Bottom line: How you do deployment matters.
More solar means more power when the sun shines. That's just as true in Florida as it is in California, yet the article is silent on how that is being handled in Florida. What other solution can there be but storage? Why aren't the same build out problems for storage in California being also faced by Florida?